Csoma v. Romania, ECtHR, 8759/05, 15/01/2013
 | 
2013

The applicant had her pregnancy terminated due to the fetus being diagnosed with hydrocephalus - Following complications from the treatment to induce abortion, her doctor had to remove her uterus and ovaries to save her life, leaving her permanently unable to bear children -  The Court concluded that the applicant's right to private life was infringed by not involving her in the choice of medical treatment or informing her of the risks, and the State failed to provide a system for redress, thus violating Article 8

Raw and Others v. France, ECtHR, 10131/11, 07/03/2013
 | 
2013

Article 8 (Respect for family life) - Failure to execute a judgment confirming an order to return underage children to their mother in the United Kingdom

Dissenting / Concurring: Paul Lemmens/Angelika Nußberger

X and Others v. Austria, ECtHR, 19010/07, 19/2/2013 [GC]
 | 
2013

Impossibility of second-parent adoption in a same-sex couple - Government's failure to provide convincing reasons for the exclusion second-parent adoption in a same-sex couple, while allowing that possibility in an unmarried different-sex couple, deemed necessary for the protection of the family in the traditional sense or for the protection of the interests of the child, amounts to discrimination

Dissenting / Concurring: Josep Casadevall, Ineta Ziemele, Anatoly Kovler, Danutė Jočienė, Ján Šikuta, Vincent A. De Gaetano, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos / Dean Spielmann

X v. Latvia, ECtHR, 27853/09, 26/11/2013 [GC]
 | 
2013

Article 8 (Family life) - Failure to conduct detailed examination of all relevant points when deciding whether to return a child pursuant to Hague Convention

Dissenting / Concurring: Nicolas Bratza, Nina Vajić, Khanlar Hajiyev, Ján Šikuta, Päivi Hirvelä, George Nicolaou, Guido Raimondi, Angelika Nußberger

I.G. and Others v. Slovakia, ECtHR, 15966/04, 13/11/2012
 | 
2012

Violation of Article 3 (treatment and investigation) and Article 8 - The case concerned three women of Roma origin who complained in particular that they had been sterilised without their full and informed consent, that the authorities’ ensuing investigation into their sterilisation had not been thorough, fair or effective and that their ethnic origin had played a decisive role in their sterilisation

I.G. v. the Republic of Moldova, ECtHR, 53519/07, 15/05/2012
 | 
2012

A Moldovan national alleged that, at the age of fourteen, she was raped by an acquaintance, she complained that the authorities had not investigated her allegations effectively and that the requirement of corroborative evidence of resistance had been discriminatory against her - Violation of Article 3 (investigation)