Fault-based divorce attributed exclusively to the applicant for failure to fulfil 'marital duties' on the grounds that she had ceased to have sexual relations with her husband - Concept of 'marital duties' runs counter to sexual freedom, the right to bodily autonomy and the states' obligation to prevent and combat domestic and sexual violence - Violation of Article 8

Art 8 • Positive obligations • Failure to protect a fourteen-year-old girl from sexual abuse • Domestic legal framework, as applied by the domestic authorities, did not afford effective protection

Art 3 and Art 8 (substantive and procedural) Respondent State having failed to effectively apply a criminal system capable of punishing non-consensual sexual acts by minors - Art 14 (+ Art 3 and Art 8) “Secondary victimisation” of one of the minors due to her exposure by the national authorities to guilt-inducing, moralising remarks conveying sexist stereotypes

Art 5 (Deprivation of liberty) - Imposition of a security measure of continued detention on the applicant on mental health grounds fell short of guarantees against arbitrariness

Art. 2 - Failure of the national authorities to fulfil their positive obligation to protect the applicant's life from violence by her partner - Acts qualified as violence against women - Lack of sufficient coordination between the various services and shortcomings in the applicable domestic law

Art 8 • Family life • Decision to grant final adoption order in respect of a child already subject to a placement order, against the wishes of his mother, who has a history of mental health support needs, formally severing the biological ties and creating legal ties with the adoptive family

Articles 8 (right to respect for private and family life), 10 (freedom of expression) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination) - Qualified English and Polish gay teacher, author of an illustrated diary on an internet website for adult gay men, asked to stop by the school principal - Removal from his position as a teacher following a decision of the Disciplinary Commission for breaching 'the dignity of the teaching profession' - Violation of Article 10

Articles 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment) and 8 (right to respect for private life) - Persecution and harassment of the applicant by her former partner and the ensuing criminal proceedings - Ineffective criminal investigations and non-compliance with procedural safeguards - Violation of Article 3

Article 3 (lack of effective investigation) and Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) - Failures in the investigation - Prejudicial gender stereotypes and victim-blaming attitudes

Transgender individuals complained about the lack of a regulatory framework in Hungary for the legal recognition of their gender identity - Inadmissible - their requests had eventually been granted in 2018, and the waiting period did not constitute an unreasonable delay under Article 8 (right to private life).

Violation of Article 8 and Article 14(+ Article 8) - Disproportionate dismissal of teacher in relation to photos posted on her private social media profile - Difference in treatment based solely on considerations of sexual orientation without particularly convincing and weighty reasons

Violation of Article 3 and Article 8 + Article 14 (Positive obligations, Effective investigation, and Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation) - Failure to adequately protect the applicant from a homophobic attack by ensuring the effective prosecution of the perpetrator and prosecuting the attack as a hate-motivated offence

Article 8 - General and absolute criminalisation of the purchase of sexual acts as part of a comprehensive legislative framework to combat prostitution and human trafficking

Art 8 (Positive obligations/Private life) - Inadequate criminal legal framework, at the material time, not affording the applicant protection against acts of online harassment committed by her former intimate partner consisting of the non-consensual public dissemination of intimate photographs of her - Failure to conduct prompt and thorough criminal investigation

Violation of Article 8 (positive obligations and private life) - Inability of the applicant, who was adopted as a child, to obtain information concerning her biological origins and health information about her biological parents - Failure to strike a balance between the competing interests at stake

Muslim girls were prohibited from wearing the Islamic veil in their schools, with the exception of non-denominational religious and ethics classes by the school regulations - inadmissible (manifestly ill-founded)

Violation of Article 10 (Freedom of expression) - Refusal by local authorities to authorise the display of an anti-discrimination illustration on advertising billboards for depicting persons with disabilities and Roma in an undignified and humiliating manner

Violation of Article 2 (procedural) - Lack of effective investigation into the alleged suicide of the applicant’s daughter in a domestic violence context - Investigative authority’s non-compliance with requirement to display particular diligence and vigour when investigating a case involving violence against women could be read as sheer unwillingness to establish the truth

Violation of Article 8 (Family life) - Termination of custody and foster care agreement of transgender person in respect of two minors on account of his diagnosis of “transsexualism” and change of gender identity

Art 10 (Positive obligations/Freedom of expression) - Authorities’ years-long failure to secure safe and uninterrupted conduct of annual international LGBT film festival organised by the applicant company - Failure to take comprehensive action and to implement dissuasive measures concerning repeated telephone bomb threats and other false security alarms on film screening days