Violation of Article 3 and Article 8 + Article 14 (Positive obligations, Effective investigation, and Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation) - Failure to adequately protect the applicant from a homophobic attack by ensuring the effective prosecution of the perpetrator and prosecuting the attack as a hate-motivated offence

A former Orthodox Metropolitan of Kalavryta, challenged his conviction for incitement to hatred and discrimination under Greek law - The conviction stemmed from public statements he made, encouraging violence and exclusion against the LGBTQ+ community - The applicant argued that his conviction violated his rights to freedom of expression under Article 10

Provisional measures - Context of systemic violations of human rights including aggressions, harassment, threats and arbitrary detentions of journalists - Violence and exposure to risk of irreparable damage for women exacerbated by gender stereotypes and prejudices 

Article 13 - Discontinuation of investigation into homophobic comments on the Internet not disclosing any prejudicial attitude by the authorities taking account of the Court’s case-law - Wide-ranging and multifaceted domestic measures combatting hate speech in response to Court judgment in Beizaras and Levickas

Article 14 (+ Article 8 and Article 11) - Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation - State’s failure to ensure LGBT event proceeded peacefully, without verbal abuse, and carry out an effective investigation into homophobic motives of counter-demonstrators

Athletics South Africa challenged the Swiss Federal Supreme Court's decision upholding World Athletics' regulations on testosterone levels in female athletes, specifically targeting athletes with Differences in Sexual Development (DSD) - The applicant argued that these regulations violated the athletes' rights to non-discrimination and personal integrity under Article 14 and Article 8

The applicant was convicted for hate speech after posting offensive comments online about homosexuality - He argued that this conviction violated his right to freedom of expression under Article 10

Article14 + Article 8 - Refusal to prosecute authors of serious homophobic comments on Facebook including undisguised calls for violence - Authorities’ failure to investigate effectively whether impugned comments constituted incitement to hatred and violence

Article 10 (Freedom of expression) - Convictions for circulating homophobic leaflets at school - No violation