J.L. v. Italy, ECtHR, 5671/16, 27/05/2021
Court: European Court of Human Rights
 | 2021

Condemnation of national courts for upholding presumptions and stereotypes of female sexuality - Positive obligations - 'Secondary victimisation' of a survivor of sexual violence due to the blaming, moralising and stereotyped gendered motivations of the domestic decision

Dissenting / Concurring: Wojtyczek

Lee v. the United Kindgom, ECtHR, 18860/19, 7/12/2021
Court: European Court of Human Rights
 | 2021

The applicant complains under Articles 8, 9 and 10, both alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention, that his rights were interfered with by a public authority (namely, the Supreme Court) by its decision to dismiss his claim for breach of statutory duty; and that the interference was not proportionate - Inadmissible

Oganezova v. Armenia, ECtHR, 71367/12, 72961/12, 17/05/2022
Court: European Court of Human Rights
 | 2021

Article 3 (+ Article 14) (Inhuman or degrading treatment, Positive obligations, and Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation) - State’s failure to protect LGBT bar owner and activist from homophobic arson, physical and verbal attacks and to carry out effective investigation - Absence of effective domestic criminal-law mechanism for investigating discrimination complaints

Romanov and Others v. Russia, ECtHR, 58358/14, 7146/15, 25887/15, 42395/15, 56617/19, 56637/19, 12/09/2023
Court: European Court of Human Rights
 | 2021

Article 3 (substantive and procedural) read in the light of Article 14 (Positive obligations/Degrading treatment/Discrimination) - Failure to take effective preventive measures aimed at protecting members of LGBTI community from violent verbal and physical hate-motivated attacks by private individuals during demonstrations and to conduct an effective investigation into homophobic motives of counter-demonstrators

S.-H. v. Poland, ECtHR, 56846/15, 56849/15, 16/11/2021
Court: European Court of Human Rights
 | 2021

Inability to obtain Polish nationality by descent by children born through surrogacy in USA to same-sex couple and residing in Israel, where legal parent-child link is recognised - inadmissible

S.N. and M.B.N. v. Switzerland, ECtHR, 12937/20, 23/11/2021
Court: European Court of Human Rights
 | 2021

Article 8 (Family life) - Return of a child to Thailand ordered by the Swiss courts in the context of international child abduction proceedings - Appropriate steps by the competent authorities to guarantee the safety of the child

Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland, ECtHR, 71552/17, 18/05/2021
Court: European Court of Human Rights
 | 2021

Article 8 - Non-recognition of parental link with non-biological child born abroad via surrogacy, while preserving bond through foster care: “family life” applicable

Women’s Initiatives Supporting Group and Others v. Georgia, ECtHR, 73204/13, 74959/13, 16/12/2021
Court: European Court of Human Rights
 | 2021

Article 3 and Article 11 (+ Article 14) - State’s failure to take operational preventive measures to protect applicants from homophobic and/or transphobic violence, conduct an effective investigation and ensure LGBT rally proceeded peacefully - Indications of official acquiescence, connivance and active participation in individual acts motivated by prejudice

X. v. Poland, ECtHR, 20741/10, 16/09/2021
Court: European Court of Human Rights
 | 2021

Article 14 (+ Article 8) Discrimination/Family life - Refusal to grant applicant full parental rights and custody over her youngest child based solely or decisively on considerations regarding her sexual orientation - Decisive and discriminatory reliance on importance of male role model

Dissenting / Concurring: Wojtyczek

Mhina Zuberi v. Tanzania, ACtHPR, 054/2016, 26/02/2021
Court: African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights
 | 2021

Violation of the right to free legal assistance due to the state's failure to ensure it to the applicant serving a sentence of thirty years imprisonment for the offence of rape

127/2020, CC, 26/05/2020
Court: Corte Costituzionale
 | 2020

Medically assisted reproduction – Alleged unequal treatment with respect to the use of heterologous medically assisted fertilisation, and violation of the principles of individual responsibility, social solidarity and protection of the personal identity of the child