The applicant claimed asylum as she had partially undergone FGM and claimed to be at risk of re-excision if sent back to Guinea - No violation

The respondent government’s proposal to return a Nigerian woman and her two daughters to Nigeria where she claimed her daughters faced the risk of female genital mutilation - There was no evidence sending the applicants back to Nigeria would amount to a violation of Article 3

Article 3 (Degrading treatment, Inhuman treatment, and Expulsion) - Alleged risk of female genital mutilation if applicant returned to Nigeria - Inadmissible

Article 3 (Expulsion) - Alleged risk of being subjected to female genital mutilation in case of extradition to Nigeria - Inadmissible